This is from the BBC:
A German biologist who offered €100,000 (£71,350; $106,300) to anyone who could prove that measles is a virus has been ordered by a court to pay up.
Stefan Lanka, who believes the illness is psychosomatic, made the pledge four years ago on his website.
The reward was later claimed by German doctor David Barden, who gathered evidence from various medical studies. Mr Lanka dismissed the findings.
The guy is a biologist? I can understand a non-scientist being deeply skeptical of journal articles and medical findings… but a biologist?
The institution that gave him his degree(s) should consider rescinding whatever degree(s) he has, because:
(a) he clearly cannot review scientific literature and gain an understanding of a subject by himself.
(b) he clearly cannot follow a trail of logic and scientific understanding through published medical research even when it is presented to him by someone else.
Here’s how human society works — we all have our own specializations, and it’s part of our responsibility as specialists to help out others who aren’t knowledgeable in, and cannot tell good from bad, or even have an understanding of, our area of expertise. This isn’t just for “scientists”, of course, but for everyone.
Imagine how little we in general know about the inner workings of our automobiles compared to the expert (mechanic) who’s in charge of fixing them. Now imagine a person who calls himself a mechanic, but (a) doesn’t understand how a certain system in the car works, and (b) cannot follow the logic, and doesn’t believe it when another mechanic shows it to him! Would you ever go solicit this person’s expertise again?
This ‘biologist’ is like our hypothetical mechanic.